American Board of Medicolegal Death Investigators (ABMDI) Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the American Board of Medicolegal Death Investigators Exam. Utilize comprehensive quizzes, flashcards, and multiple-choice questions to enhance your knowledge and increase your confidence before the test day.

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


What risk does a death investigator face by not following laws related to evidence collection?

  1. Risking the lives of individuals at the scene

  2. Risking the integrity of evidence collected

  3. Risking the loss of the case

  4. Acting reasonably based on their training

The correct answer is: Risking the integrity of evidence collected

The risk that a death investigator faces by not adhering to laws related to evidence collection primarily involves compromising the integrity of the evidence gathered. When proper procedures and legal guidelines are not followed, the evidence may become tainted or inadmissible in court, leading to significant issues in establishing the facts surrounding a death. This not only affects the current investigation but can also impact the ability to solve the case or prosecute any related criminal activity, as the reliability of evidence is crucial for judicial processes. Following laws and best practices in evidence collection is essential for maintaining a clear chain of custody and ensuring that all evidence can withstand scrutiny during legal proceedings. This ultimately protects the integrity of the investigation and upholds the justice system. Other options present different scenarios that might be related to the investigator's actions but do not capture the primary legal and procedural concern. For example, while risking the lives of individuals at the scene is certainly a serious consideration, it is not directly tied to the failure to follow evidence collection laws. Similarly, while the loss of a case can occur due to mishandled evidence, it stems from the compromised integrity of the evidence itself. Acting reasonably based on training may not be sufficient if it conflicts with legal requirements, highlighting the need for adherence to established laws and