American Board of Medicolegal Death Investigators (ABMDI) Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the American Board of Medicolegal Death Investigators Exam. Utilize comprehensive quizzes, flashcards, and multiple-choice questions to enhance your knowledge and increase your confidence before the test day.

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


If new evidence arises in an old suicide case, what is the most appropriate action for a death investigator to take?

  1. Contact the DA at once

  2. Reestablish contact with the pathologist and the investigating agency

  3. Be ready for and patient with family denial

  4. Promise to reinvestigate with the FBI

The correct answer is: Reestablish contact with the pathologist and the investigating agency

In cases where new evidence surfaces regarding an old suicide investigation, the most appropriate course of action involves reestablishing contact with the pathologist and the investigating agency that originally handled the case. This step is crucial as it allows for a thorough review of the new evidence in the context of the existing findings. By coordinating with the pathologist, the investigator can assess how the new information may affect the original conclusions about the cause and manner of death. Similarly, reconnecting with the agency that conducted the initial investigation ensures that all parties involved can collaboratively analyze the implications of this new evidence, potentially leading to a reassessment of the case. Collaborating with these professionals is essential because suicides can often be complex, with forensic evidence playing a key role in determining the circumstances surrounding the death. It is also critical to ensure that any investigation into past cases follows proper procedures, which typically involves gathering insights from those who were previously engaged in the investigation. This approach positions the investigator to comprehensively and effectively address the new information, supporting a potential reevaluation of the case while maintaining a standard of professionalism and adherence to established investigative protocols.